home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_833 / 833r048.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  79KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree
OCR: 1 ASSUMING PLAINTIFF HAS ADEQU ATELY PLED SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIM SUCH TIME-BARREI) UNDER THE STATUTE OF LIMTATION The statute of limitations for civil rights claims asserted ir federal courts situated in the State Illinois two years. Garcia, 471 261 (1985): Antom Lephamer 787 ,2d 1141 (7th 1986 Because Peti- tioner's federal lawsuit was not filed until June 26. 1990 all claims arising from his arrest in October 1987, were time barred (See App. 4a). The eriminal charge however was not dismissed until June 27 1988. The district court concluded, therefore that the statute 01 limitationa did not bar Petitioners 1983 civil rights claim for malicious prosecution because such "accru[e] when the prose- cution terminates im favor of the defendant (App 17a}. 1 Petitioner's substantive due pro ...